Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 July 20253352963

Land to the Rear of Millennium House, 51 High Street, Feltham, Greater London, TW13 4AB

Planning appeal 3352963 at Land to the Rear of Millennium House, 51 High Street, Feltham, Greater London, TW13 4AB (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 11 July 2025 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety.

‘Three storey detached building with ground floor and roof gardens to be built in an underused part of an existing car park highest inhabited floor is 5.098 meters above external ground level’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A
Postcode
TW13 4AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Millennium House, with particular regard to privacy and disturbance
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of external amenity space
  • whether the proposed scheme would meet the development plan requirements in respect of carbon emissions

What decided it

The proposal would harm highway and pedestrian safety through inadequate parking bay dimensions, failure to demonstrate safe vehicle manoeuvres, and poor pedestrian access arrangements that would create unacceptable conflict with vehicles, contrary to Policies EC2, CC2 and T2.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EC2Policy CC2Policy T2Policy SC5Policy EQ1Policy EQ2Policy SI2Policy SI5Policy SI15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

235 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266011171
    45 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
  2. Dismissed13 October 20266007899
    92 Windmill Road, Brentford, TW8 9NA
  3. Allowed24 September 20266010652
    14 Turnham Green Terrace Mews, Chiswick, London, W4 1QU
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266006466
    88A Crispen Road, Feltham, TW13 6QR
  5. Allowed13 July 20266006483
    Units 4 and 10 Turnham Green Terrace Mews, Chiswick, London, W4 1QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.