Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 April 20253353040

Land at Old Sarum Airfield , Old Sarum, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 6FW

Planning appeal 3353040 at Land at Old Sarum Airfield , Old Sarum, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 6FW (Wiltshire Council) was allowed on 9 April 2025 by Inspector Fagan N, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development scheme could, in terms of its likely financial viability, deliver 25% affordable housing units [the viability issue].

Outline application (all matters reserved except access) for demolition, modification & renovation of existing buildings and site development, provision of approx. 315 residential dwellings, mixed employment/commercial/leisure/aviation uses including a 'flying hub', new vehicular access, parking, footpath/cycle connections, green infrastructure, SUDS and waste water treatment works, and associated engineering works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Fagan N
Postcode
SP4 6FW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development scheme could, in terms of its likely financial viability, deliver 25% affordable housing units [the viability issue]
  • Whether the use of the C287 Ford Road to access the dwellings in Area C would be safe and otherwise acceptable including for existing walkers and cyclists using the road and whether Area C would be accessible by sustainable transport modes [the highways issue]
  • Whether, and if so how, the proposed development would result in 'less than substantial harm' to the designated heritage assets in the area (including potentially their settings), namely any of the listed buildings on or adjacent to the site, the Old Sarum Airfield Conservation Area (CA), the Old Sarum Scheduled Monument (SM) and the Stratford Sub Castle CA that surrounds it, and if so, whether such harm would be outweighed by any public benefits of the development [the heritage issue]
  • The planning balance: whether other material considerations would outweigh any conflict with the development plan, either in terms of the standard or tilted balance

What decided it

The heritage benefits, in particular the restoration/rebuilding of the at-risk Grade II* Hangar 3, were found by the Inspector (agreeing with Historic England) to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, underpinning the finding of overall accordance with the development plan.

The heritage benefits alone (notably Hangar 3's restoration) outweighed the mid-range less than substantial harm to heritage assets, and this was reinforced by additional benefits including 315 dwellings (79 affordable) in an area with only a 2.03-year housing land supply, landscape/community benefits and improved sustainable transport links, leading to an overall finding of accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP25CP43CP57CP58CP60CP61CP62CP50CP51CP52CP55CP1CP23R2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 59Paragraph 209Paragraph 215Paragraph 110Paragraph 112Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266008440
    Saxon, Castle Road, Devizes, SN10 1HL
  2. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266007352
    Land to the East of New Road, Melksham, SN12 7QZ
  4. Dismissed13 July 20266002635
    Castle View Care Centre, 8 Old Castle Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 3SF
  5. Dismissed13 July 20266003469
    North Farm, West Overton, Marlborough, SN8 1QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.