Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite The Field House, Netherwood Lane, Chadwick End. Solihull, West Midlands
Planning appeal 3353109 at Land Opposite The Field House, Netherwood Lane, Chadwick End. Solihull, West Midlands (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 21 February 2025 by Inspector Willis S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
five self-build plots and associated works
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Willis S
- Postcode
- B93 0BD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development regarding accessibility and reliance on private motor vehicles
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial weight attributable to the shortfall in housing land supply and the shortfall in self-build plots, secured by planning obligation, clearly outweighed the Green Belt and other harms, establishing very special circumstances.
The substantial weight given to the contribution towards housing land supply and self-build provision, together with lesser benefits, clearly outweighed the harm from inappropriateness, loss of openness/encroachment, lack of affordable housing, harm to character and appearance, and limited accessibility, amounting to very special circumstances justifying the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P17Policy P5Policy P7Policy P15Policy P8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Solihull
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed23 October 20266013961The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
- Allowed23 October 20266009733Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
- Allowed12 August 20266010526The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
- Allowed17 July 20266005246Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
- Dismissed28 May 20266006096The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®