Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 December 20253353297

the annexe 9 Enfield Crescent, POOLE, BH15 3SJ

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Braithwaite J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the annexe has been in continuous occupation as a separate dwelling for the four year period prior to the date of application to be immune from enforcement action

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficient precise and unambiguous evidence to prove continuous occupation of the annexe for the four year period required by law.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.