Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 March 20263353527

50 South Hill Park, London, NW3 2SJ

proposed amalgamation of two self-contained maisonettes into a single dwellinghouse

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Whitfield J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the LPA's decision to refuse the LDC application was well-founded

What decided it

The chronic shortfall in housing delivery in the Borough against its development plan targets, combined with the conflict with Policy HC1 of the Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan, meant the loss of one housing unit would constitute a material change of use with significant planning consequences.

Plan policies cited: Policy H1 of the Camden Local Plan 2017, Policy H3 of the Camden Local Plan 2017, Policy HC1 of the Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033

Judgments cited: Richmond upon Thames LBC v SSETR [2001] JPL 84; Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v SSCLG and others [2016] EWHC 1785 (Admin); Lambeth v SSLUCH [2024] EWHC 1391 (Admin); Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest RDC [1972] 1 WLR 1207

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.