Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 December 20243353529

2 Rylston Road, Southgate, Enfield, London, N13 5NQ

Planning appeal 3353529 at 2 Rylston Road, Southgate, Enfield, London, N13 5NQ (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 10 December 2024 by Inspector Thomas M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area.

a “single-storey front extension, part single-storey rear extension, first-floor side and rear extension.” S

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Thomas M
Postcode
N13 5NQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area
  • Whether there is sufficient information on which to assess the risk of flooding

What decided it

The proposed development would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area through its excessive bulk, poor design and lack of subservience, and insufficient flood risk information was provided to assess the development's impact on flood safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021Policy DMD 8 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 11 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 13 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 14 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy SI 12 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI 13 of the London Plan 2021Policy DMD 59 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 60 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 62 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy CP 28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (adopted 2010)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

474 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.