Planning appeal decision
2 Rylston Road, Southgate, Enfield, London, N13 5NQ
Planning appeal 3353529 at 2 Rylston Road, Southgate, Enfield, London, N13 5NQ (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 10 December 2024 by Inspector Thomas M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area.
a “single-storey front extension, part single-storey rear extension, first-floor side and rear extension.” S
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Thomas M
- Postcode
- N13 5NQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area
- Whether there is sufficient information on which to assess the risk of flooding
What decided it
The proposed development would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area through its excessive bulk, poor design and lack of subservience, and insufficient flood risk information was provided to assess the development's impact on flood safety.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021Policy DMD 8 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 11 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 13 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 14 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy SI 12 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI 13 of the London Plan 2021Policy DMD 59 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 60 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy DMD 62 of the Enfield Development Management Document (adopted 2014)Policy CP 28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (adopted 2010)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 2026601285577 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Dismissed29 September 2026601020761 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
- Dismissed28 September 2026601259821 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®