Planning appeal decision
Land at Bayswater Farm, Bayswater Farm Road, Oxford, OX3 8EB
Planning appeal 3353532 at Land at Bayswater Farm, Bayswater Farm Road, Oxford, OX3 8EB (Oxford City Council) was dismissed on 9 May 2025 by Inspector Woodwards O, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to landscape, the rural edge location and quantum of proposed development.
for up to 121 dwellings and a care home, including open space and green infrastructure
- Authority
- Oxford City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Woodwards O
- Postcode
- OX3 8EB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to landscape, the rural edge location and quantum of proposed development
- the effect of the proposal on ecology, with particular regard to Barbastelle bats
- whether or not the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal living conditions
- the principle of obtaining access over unregistered land
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety and the free-flow of traffic in the Sandhills Estate
- whether or not the proposed development would be likely to increase the likelihood of flooding in the area, with regard to surface water run-off
- whether or not adequate arrangements are made for the disposal of foul and surface water from the site
- the overall planning balance
What decided it
For Scheme A, the unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers caused by bat-mitigation measures (tinted glazing and permanently closed automated blinds) outweighed the scheme's benefits even under the tilted balance; for Scheme B, the absence of any such harm and overall compliance with the Development Plan secured approval.
For Scheme A, the sub-standard living conditions caused by the bat mitigation measures significantly and demonstrably outweighed the substantial benefits of market and affordable housing and the care home, resulting in dismissal; for Scheme B, the substantial benefits and absence of significant harm meant the proposal complied with the Development Plan as a whole and the balance favoured approval.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV1Policy ENV2Policy DES1Policy DES2Policy DES5Policy STRAT13Policy STRAT5Policy STRAT6Policy H9Policy EP4Policy INF4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Oxford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed7 October 2026601337327 Norham Road, Oxford, OX2 6SQ
- Allowed25 September 2026600586114A Benson Road, Oxford, OX3 7EH
- Allowed23 July 2026600837067 Botley Road, Oxford, OX2 0BS
- Allowed17 July 2026600884713a Sandfield Road, Oxford, OX3 7RQ
- Dismissed2 February 20266002005155 Godstow Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 8PG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®