Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 May 20253353661

4 Gardenia Road, Enfield, EN1 2HZ

Planning appeal 3353661 at 4 Gardenia Road, Enfield, EN1 2HZ (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 13 May 2025 by Inspector Marriott H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 2, with particular regard to sunlight and outlook.

‘construction of a single storey ground floor rear extension. Rear extension shall only extend by 3m beyond the current existing extension. This would create a cumulative depth of 5.5m beyond the original wall of the property. This would be acceptable as it is only 3m beyond the neighbouring ground floor habitable window. The new extension shall be a flat roof height of 3m and an eaves height of 2.85m. No work shall be done on the loft level, first floor level or front elevation of the property.’

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marriott H
Postcode
EN1 2HZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 2, with particular regard to sunlight and outlook

What decided it

The single storey scale and limited projection of the proposed extension would not result in an adverse effect on the living conditions of the adjoining occupiers, particularly regarding sunlight and outlook.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025Policy DMD8 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (DPD) (2014)Policy DMD11 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (DPD) (2014)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

442 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.