Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 June 20253353964

Woodland Lodge , Frilford Heath, Abingdon , Oxfordshire, OX13 5QG

Planning appeal 3353964 at Woodland Lodge , Frilford Heath, Abingdon , Oxfordshire, OX13 5QG (Vale of White Horse District Council) was dismissed on 11 June 2025 by Inspector Jarvis P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including the effect on irreplaceable and priority habitats.

Self-build / custom-build three-bedroom dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jarvis P
Postcode
OX13 5QG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including the effect on irreplaceable and priority habitats
  • If inappropriate, the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect on minerals safeguarding area and adjoining quarry
  • The effect on highway safety, including parking and turning provision
  • The effect on the trees covered by the Tree Preservation Order (TPO)
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether suitable waste collection and storage facilities would be provided
  • Whether suitable foul drainage measures can be accommodated
  • Whether there would be access to sustainable travel options
  • If inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and purposes, compounded by failure to demonstrate no adverse impacts on irreplaceable ancient woodland and priority habitats, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by the benefits of affordable self-build housing and woodland management.

The benefits of providing an affordable self-build family home and enhanced woodland management were given significant weight but were insufficient to clearly outweigh the substantial harm arising from inappropriate Green Belt development, harm to openness and Green Belt purposes, and other identified harms including highway safety, ancient woodland and priority habitats, trees, minerals safeguarding, character and appearance, and sustainable travel accessibility.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP3Policy C13(v)Policy C13(vi)Policy CP24Policy C13Policy M8Policy M9Policy CP33Policy DP16Policy CP44Policy CP37Policy CP40Policy CP43Policy DP28Policy CP42Policy CP35
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 153Paragraph 116Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

1 other decided appeal within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Vale of White Horse

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed11 September 20266005108
    Land West of Little Smiths Farm, Drayton, OX14 4JP
  2. Dismissed10 July 20266008237
    Land at Downs Close, Downs Close, Harwell, OX11 0LP
  3. Dismissed7 July 20266004667
    Land to the South of Cottage Farm, Cottage Road, Stanford in the Vale, SN7 8HY
  4. Dismissed21 May 20266003590
    Woodland Farm, Appleton Road, Longworth, OX13 5EF
  5. Dismissed7 May 20263348862
    29 Colley Wood, Kennington, Oxford, OX1 5NF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.