®Planning appeal decision
40 Skeena Hill, LONDON, SW18 5PL
‘demolition of existing garage to be replaced by a set back double storey side extension, creation of a basement under part of the existing foot print and rear extension, changes to existing roof including installation of roof lights, creation of a rear dormer window, existing windows to be replaced to match original and internal alterations’
- Authority
- London Borough of Wandsworth
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Davis J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, including on the Sutherland Grove Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular reference to outlook
What decided it
The rear extensions would be highly dominant and overbearing when viewed from neighbouring properties and gardens, causing harmful effects on both the character and appearance of the conservation area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.
Plan policies cited: Policy LP3, Policy LP1, Policy LP2, Policy LP5
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.