Planning appeal decision
Thornet Wood Road, Bickley, Bromley, Kent, BR1 2LW
Planning appeal 3354266 at Thornet Wood Road, Bickley, Bromley, Kent, BR1 2LW (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 31 March 2025 by Inspector Sutton A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
‘Retention of events marquee measuring 30 x 20 m with associated decking and ancillary marquee structures.’
- Authority
- London Borough of Bromley
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Sutton A
- Postcode
- BR1 2LW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of occupants of nearby dwellings, having particular regard to noise
- The effect of the development on highway safety in the area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm from inappropriate development and loss of openness in the Green Belt, compounded by unresolved uncertainty over noise harm to neighbouring living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
the substantial Green Belt harms (inappropriateness and loss of openness), together with unresolved noise-related harm to living conditions, were not clearly outweighed by the moderate-weight economic and social benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the development
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2Policy 49Policy 20Policy S1Policy GG1Policy 119Policy 37Policy D13Policy D14Policy 30Policy T6Policy T6.4Policy T3Policy T4Policy 32Policy 26Policy 21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155Paragraph 143Paragraph 146
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Bromley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Split Decision5 August 20263378375Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
- Notice upheld28 July 20263353877Crystal Palace Football Club Youth Academy, Beckenham, London, BR3 1NZ
- Split Decision10 July 2026334676727 Victoria Gardens, Biggin Hill, Westerham, TN16 3DJ
- Planning permission granted17 June 20263351724Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd, 30 Station Road, Orpington, BR6 0SA
- Allowed28 May 20266007385223 Crofton Lane, Petts Wood, Orpington, Kent, BR6 0BL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®