Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 March 20253354547

42 Chepstow Villas, London, W11 2QY

Planning appeal 3354547 at 42 Chepstow Villas, London, W11 2QY (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was allowed on 27 March 2025 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers.

for alterations and extensions, comprising the addition of mansard accommodation at roof level, a new single-storey basement level, the demolition and replacement of the secondary entrance porch on Denbigh Road and the comprehensive repair and restoration of all aspects of the house and studio, including replacement of the existing windows with slimline double- glazing and minor alterations to the Denbigh Road and rear elevations

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
W11 2QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers
  • The character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and that of the local area, with reference to the Pembridge Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed basement depth for the swimming pool and service trench, whilst exceeding standard policy guidance, was justified by reference to a similar allowed appeal and by the underlying policy aim of protecting neighbour living conditions, which would be adequately safeguarded through construction management conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CD11Policy CD4Policy CD9

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 841 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed19 May 20266002487
    80 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UW
  2. Dismissed24 February 20266000895
    6 St. Marys Gate, London, W8 5UA
  3. Allowed8 January 20263362805
    53 Egerton Crescent, London, SW3 2ED
  4. Dismissed22 December 20253369601
    39 Harrington Gardens, London, SW7 4JU
  5. Dismissed21 November 20253371695
    Flat 7, 50 Hans Place, London, SW1X 0LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.