Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20253354607

Land east of Hayes Drive and north of Church Lane, Three Mile Cross, Reading, Berkshire

outline application for the proposed erection of up to 148 dwellings together with associated infrastructure including public open space, with access only to be considered

Authority
Wokingham Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Watson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the countryside
  • The effect upon surface drainage
  • The safety and wellbeing of future residents of the proposed development, and the wider public, with regard to the proximity of the Atomic Weapons Establishment site at Burghfield (AWE(B))
  • The future capability and capacity of AWE(B) to operate effectively

What decided it

The unacceptable risk to the future capability and capacity of AWE(B) to operate effectively, given its critical importance to national security, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.

Very significant weight to housing and affordable housing delivery, plus smaller benefits, was weighed against very substantial weight attached to risk to AWE(B)'s operational capability, substantial weight to risk to residents' safety and wellbeing, significant weight to countryside harm, and great weight to heritage harm; the adverse impacts were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

Framework references: 11, 49, 57, 58, 102, 181, 182, 187, 200, 212, 215, 236

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CP1, CS Policy CP3, CS Policy CP11, CS Policy CP19, MDD Policy CC02, MDD Policy CC03, MDD Policy CC10, MDD Policy TB04, MDD Policy TB21, MDD Policy TB24, SNP Policy 8, Saved Policy NRM6

Judgments cited: Together against Sizewell C Limited v Secretary of State [2023] EWHC 1526; West Berkshire DC v SSCLG 2016 EWCA Civ 441; Vistry v SoS [2024] EWHC 2088; (1) Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd (2) Hallam Land Management Ltd (3) Wilson Enterprises Ltd v West Berkshire District Council and others [2021] EWHC 289 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.