Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 September 20263354664

Coningsby Farm Coningsby Lane, Fifield, Maidenhead, SL6 2PF

Planning appeal 3354664 at Coningsby Farm Coningsby Lane, Fifield, Maidenhead, SL6 2PF (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 21 September 2026 by Inspector Hitchcock R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development as constructed fell within the provisions of Article 3(1) and Class A, Part 2 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) on the date of the application.

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development as constructed fell within the provisions of Article 3(1) and Class A, Part 2 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) on the date of the application

What decided it

The soil bund, by reason of its significant scale, mass, bulk, volume and the engineering operations required to construct it, cannot be characterised as a 'minor operation' within the meaning of Part 2 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO, and does not form a continuous means of enclosure as required by Class A.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Eatherley v Camden LBC & Ireland [2016] EWHC 3108 (admin); Prengate Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment [1973]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Allowed26 October 20266014376
    Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266009005
    59 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
  5. Notice upheld24 September 20263353235
    Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.