Planning appeal decision
Callins Cottage, Beenhams Heath, Shurlock Row, Reading, RG10 0QD
Planning appeal 3354672 at Callins Cottage, Beenhams Heath, Shurlock Row, Reading, RG10 0QD (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 19 June 2025 by Inspector Bristow T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposal in terms of vulnerability to flooding.
described in the application form as the ‘conversion and extension of former implement shed (building H) to dwelling’
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bristow T
- Postcode
- RG10 0QD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposal in terms of vulnerability to flooding
- The effect of the proposal to historic significance
- The effect of the proposal to ecology and biodiversity
- Whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of achieving climate change objectives
What decided it
The flood mitigation measures integral to the scheme would cause less-than-substantial but unjustified harm to the listed building's historic significance and integrity, and the public benefits of residential conversion do not provide clear and convincing justification for this harm in conflict with NPPF paragraph 213 and BLP policy HE1.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- BLP policy QP5BLP policy NR1BLP policy NR2BLP policy SP2BLP policy HE1Hurley and the Walthams Neighbourhood Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 154Paragraph 161Paragraph 167Paragraph 170Paragraph 176Paragraph 187Paragraph 202Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Allowed26 October 20266014376Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed9 October 2026600900559 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®