Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20253354672

Callins Cottage, Beenhams Heath, Shurlock Row, READING, RG10 0QD

described in the application form as the ‘conversion and extension of former implement shed (building H) to dwelling’

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bristow T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposal in terms of vulnerability to flooding
  • The effect of the proposal to historic significance
  • The effect of the proposal to ecology and biodiversity
  • Whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of achieving climate change objectives

What decided it

The flood mitigation measures integral to the scheme would cause less-than-substantial but unjustified harm to the listed building's historic significance and integrity, and the public benefits of residential conversion do not provide clear and convincing justification for this harm in conflict with NPPF paragraph 213 and BLP policy HE1.

Framework references: 11, 56, 154, 161, 167, 170, 176, 187, 202, 212, 213, 215

Plan policies cited: BLP policy QP5, BLP policy NR1, BLP policy NR2, BLP policy SP2, BLP policy HE1, Hurley and the Walthams Neighbourhood Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.