Planning appeal decision
Callins Cottage, Beenhams Heath, Shurlock Row, READING, RG10 0QD
described in the application form as the ‘conversion and extension of former implement shed (building H) to dwelling’
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bristow T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposal in terms of vulnerability to flooding
- The effect of the proposal to historic significance
- The effect of the proposal to ecology and biodiversity
- Whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of achieving climate change objectives
What decided it
The flood mitigation measures integral to the scheme would cause less-than-substantial but unjustified harm to the listed building's historic significance and integrity, and the public benefits of residential conversion do not provide clear and convincing justification for this harm in conflict with NPPF paragraph 213 and BLP policy HE1.
Framework references: 11, 56, 154, 161, 167, 170, 176, 187, 202, 212, 213, 215
Plan policies cited: BLP policy QP5, BLP policy NR1, BLP policy NR2, BLP policy SP2, BLP policy HE1, Hurley and the Walthams Neighbourhood Plan
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®