Planning appeal decision
Tiverton, The Spinney, Sunningdale, Ascot, SL5 0AS
Planning appeal 3354905 at Tiverton, The Spinney, Sunningdale, Ascot, SL5 0AS (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 4 July 2025 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
construction of 6 no. apartments and car barn following demolition of the existing dwelling and outbuildings
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
- Postcode
- SL5 0AS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect on trees
- the effect on biodiversity, particularly bats, and whether the appeal proposal provides Biodiversity Net Gain
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area
- whether the proposal complies with the adopted policies relating to climate change and carbon emissions
What decided it
The substantial harm to character and appearance caused by the formalised parking and vehicle movements associated with six flats, combined with the unmitigated harm to the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area, outweighed the limited housing benefits and triggered the strong reasons for refusal exception to the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The limited benefits of five additional dwellings and housing supply contribution were outweighed by substantial harm to character and appearance, risk to a protected tree, and unmitigated harm to the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area, with the latter providing a strong reason for refusal under paragraph 11d of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP3Policy NR3Policy NR2Policy NR4Policy SP2Policy EP1Policy NP/DG/1.2Policy NP/H2Policy NP/DG1Policy NP/DG2Policy NP/DG3Policy NP/EN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 194
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Allowed26 October 20266014376Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed9 October 2026600900559 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®