Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 May 20263355092

Yorkshire Water Castleford Waste Treatment Works , Wheldon Road, Castleford, West Yorkshire , WF10 2PP

Proposed Ground Mounted Solar Array, on operational land at Castleford Wastewater Treatment Works with installed generating capacity of up to 354kW and would be connected to the WWTW via underground cables , power generated to be utilised by Yorkshire Water to power the operations of the WWTW, with very occasionally any excess power produced to be exported to the grid. __________________________________________________________________________________

Authority
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Kean G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed solar equipment is permitted development considering the definitions of a "building" and "plant or machinery" in the GPDO
  • whether the proposals can only be considered in Part 14, not Part 13 of GPDO

What decided it

Ground-mounted solar arrays are properly characterised as 'plant or machinery' under Article 2(1) of the GPDO because they constitute apparatus used for carrying on the sewerage undertaker's business of generating power for WWTW operations, rather than premises or buildings.

Judgments cited: Skerrits of Nottingham Limited v. SSETR [2000] EWCA Civ 5569; Barvis Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another (1971) 22 P&CR 710; Cheshire County Council v Woodward and Another [1962] 2WLR 636; Wimpy International Ltd. v Warland (1987) 61 T.C. 51; Wimpy International Ltd. v Warland [1989] S.T.C. 273; ACT Construction Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1981] 1 WLR; Evans v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 4111 (Admin); Inland Revenue Commissioners v Barclay, Curle & Co. Ltd [1969] 1 W.L.R. 675; Yarmouth v. France (1887) 19 Q.B.D. 647; Blake v Shaw (1860) Johnson 732 70 E.R. 615; Haigh v Charles W Ireland Ltd House of Lords (Scotland) [1974] 1 W.L.R. 43; R (on the application of Gabriel Clarke-Holland) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities v Braintree DC, Secretary of State for Defence [2023] EWHC 3140 (Admin); CAB Housing Ltd v SSLUHC [2023] EWCA Civ 194; R (Mawbey) v Lewisham; R v Oxfordshire County Council and another, ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council [1999] 3 All E R 385; Carr v Sayer (1992) 65 T.C. 15; Garland v MHLG [1968] 20 P&CR 9; R. (on the application of Nigel Mawbey), London Borough of Lewisham Council, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd. [2019] EWCA Civ 1016

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.