®Planning appeal decision
340 High Street , Enfield, London, EN3 4DE
Change of use from GP Surgery to C3 Residential Dwellinghouse”
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Armstrong N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would provide an adequate level of private amenity space for its occupants
- the effect of the development on surface water management and flood risk
What decided it
The inadequate provision of private amenity space that would function more as pedestrian access than useable garden space, combined with insufficient evidence of appropriate surface water management, meant the development conflicted with the development plan and could not be justified.
Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of The London Plan, Policy D4 of The London Plan, Policy CP30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy DMD6 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD8 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD9 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD37 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy SI13 of The London Plan, Policy CP21 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy CP28 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy DMD59 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD60 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD61 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD62 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (2014)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.