Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 February 20253355117

Hilton Court, Ashford Road, Harrietsham, Maidstone, Kent, ME17 1AJ

Planning appeal 3355117 at Hilton Court, Ashford Road, Harrietsham, Maidstone, Kent, ME17 1AJ (Maidstone Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 February 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA).

the change of use of the old canteen to a 3-bedroomed detached property by a hip to gable rear roof extension, dormer addition to the West facing elevation with obscure window and two dormers to the East facing elevation and a new 4-bedroomed detached double storey residential dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
De Freitas Terceiro P
Postcode
ME17 1AJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
  • whether acceptable living conditions would be created for future occupiers with particular regard to the private external space

What decided it

The substantial harm to the significance and setting of the non-designated heritage asset caused by the proposed new dwelling's height, size and scale competing with the schoolhouse and the cluttered layout of the development outweighed the benefits of restoration and reuse.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LPRSP14(B)LPRSP15LPRENV1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

34 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed5 October 20266008294
    Land West of Lodge Road, Staplehurst, TN12 0RQ
  2. Allowed18 June 20266004838
    3 Manor Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, ME14 4BY
  3. Dismissed31 March 20263375683
    Land to the Rear of the Taj of Kent, Marden, Kent, TN12 9HS
  4. Allowed2 March 20263375644
    Plot 8, Eclipse Park, Sittingbourne Road, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 3EN
  5. Allowed24 October 20253367625
    Merrymaids Farm, Couchman Green Lane, Staplehurst, Kent, TN12 0RR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.