Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20253355163

Boydell Court, St John's Wood Park, London, NW8 6NH

Planning appeal 3355163 at Boydell Court, St John's Wood Park, London, NW8 6NH (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 13 March 2025 by Inspector Butcher C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the construction of a new 2 storey, 3 bedroom dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Butcher C
Postcode
NW8 6NH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, as well as the occupiers of the flats within Block D, with particular regard to ceiling height, outlook, the amount of private garden space and air quality

What decided it

The combined material harm to character and appearance and to living conditions, when assessed against the Framework as a whole, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of providing a single new home in an area with housing shortfall.

The benefits of housing delivery and efficient land use were outweighed by the significant and enduring harm to character and appearance and living conditions, assessed against the Framework as a whole under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D3Policy D6Policy A1Policy H6Policy C1Policy CC4London Plan Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

730 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.