Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 February 20253355242

2 Dale Lodge Road, Ascot, SL5 0LY

Planning appeal 3355242 at 2 Dale Lodge Road, Ascot, SL5 0LY (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 10 February 2025 by Inspector Barnes D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, in particular the streetscene.

the demolition of existing rear conservatory and construction of double storey side extensions, single storey side and rear extension, single storey front porch extension and renovation of existing property to alter materials

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Barnes D
Postcode
SL5 0LY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, in particular the streetscene
  • the effect of the proposed development on a protected species

What decided it

The absence of an emergence survey to confirm or rule out bat activity meant the Inspector could not be satisfied that the development would not cause unacceptable harm to a protected species, which outweighed the acceptable character and appearance impacts.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy QP3 of the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033Policy NP/DG2 of the Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Neighbourhood PlanLP Policy NR2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

93 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Allowed26 October 20266014376
    Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266009005
    59 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
  5. Notice upheld24 September 20263353235
    Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.