Planning appeal decision
Land South of Howland Road, Marden, Kent, TN12 9EP
Planning appeal 3355760 at Land South of Howland Road, Marden, Kent, TN12 9EP (Maidstone Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 June 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the rural character and appearance of the area.
Erection of 9 no 1, 2 and 3 bed affordable dwellinghouses for local people under the rural exception policy
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- TN12 9EP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the rural character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety in the area
- Whether the site is an accessible location for the proposal having regard to local and national planning policy, and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities
- The effect of the proposal on heritage assets with particular regard to the setting of five listed buildings, The Old House; Pastures End & Poachers Keep; Bridgehurst Farmhouse; Stone Pit Farmhouse; and Stone Pit Barn
- The effect of the proposal on protected species and biodiversity net gain (BNG)
What decided it
The combination of unacceptable highway safety risks, unsuitability of the location due to car-dependency, insufficient ecological survey data for protected species, and significant harm to rural character and heritage setting collectively outweighed the substantial benefits of affordable housing delivery.
The significant benefits of affordable housing delivery and local economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harm to rural character and appearance, highway safety, site accessibility, heritage assets, and unresolved biodiversity impacts.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LPRSP9LPRSP14(A)LPRSP14(B)LPRSP15LPRHOU6LPRQD4LPRSS1LPRENV1NE3NE4BE1BE2In2In3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 99Paragraph 135Paragraph 193Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 2026601053621 Tasker Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, ME15 8NZ
- Allowed27 October 20266015190Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed27 October 20266011721Loxley House, Gravelly Bottom Road, Kingswood, Maidstone, ME17 3NT
- Allowed27 October 20266011076Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed26 October 20266010539Land Rear Of 58 Church Street, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®