Planning appeal decision
Paley Street, Paley Street, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 3JS
Planning appeal 3355780 at Paley Street, Paley Street, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 3JS (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 28 May 2025 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
erection of a pair of semi-detached dwellings on land at 'Brook House' with associated parking and amenity space
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Philpott M
- Postcode
- SL6 3JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on ecology
- whether the proposal would include a suitable vehicular access
- whether the proposal would incorporate satisfactory measures to adapt to and mitigate climate change
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development, combined with unacceptable highway safety impacts and failure to demonstrate climate change mitigation, are not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply contribution, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.
The moderate benefits of housing supply contribution and modest construction and economic benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, the inappropriateness of the development, unacceptable highway safety impacts, and failure to demonstrate climate change mitigation measures.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- QP5QP3IF2NR2NR3EP1SP2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
- Dismissed27 July 20266008948Land To The North of Stubbings Farm Cottages, Burchetts Green Road Burchetts Green, Windsor And Maidenhead, Maidenhead, SL6 6QT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®