Planning appeal decision
Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ
Planning appeal 3355798 at Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 20 June 2025 by Inspector Knight A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
construction of a part single-storey, part two-storey side/rear wraparound extension and a front porch, following demolition of existing front porch and side extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Knight A
- Postcode
- UB10 0EZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness, and the other considerations are insufficient to comprise the very special circumstances necessary to justify it.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of The London PlanPolicy DMEI 4 of the Hillingdon Local PlanPolicy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local PlanPolicy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local PlanPolicy DMHB 12 of the Hillingdon Local PlanPolicy DMHD 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 September 20266010520Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
- Notice varied and upheld29 July 20253363007Land on the West Side of High Street, Harlington, Hayes, UB3 5DW
- Allowed21 February 20253341154Chandigrah Summerhouse Lane, Harefield, Uxbridge, UB9 6HS
- Dismissed1 November 20243345366Grass Verge Adjacent To 19 Rutters Close, West Drayton, UB7 9AL
- Dismissed11 October 20243338381Whitehouse Building, Northwood Road, Hillingdon, Harefield, UB9 6PT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®