Planning appeal decision
Former Hamble Airfield, Hamble Lane, Hamble Le Rice, Hampshire , SO31 4NE
Planning appeal 3355894 at Former Hamble Airfield, Hamble Lane, Hamble Le Rice, Hampshire , SO31 4NE (Hampshire County Council) was allowed on 16 October 2025 by Inspector Normington S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The need for the proposed development with particular regard to the landbank position for sand and gravel and the need for inert waste disposal in the County.
the extraction of sand and gravel, with restoration to grazing land and recreation using imported inert restoration materials, the erection of associated plant and infrastructure and the creation of a new footpath and access onto Hamble Lane
- Authority
- Hampshire County Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- minerals-waste · Unknown
- Inspector
- Normington S
- Postcode
- SO31 4NE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The need for the proposed development with particular regard to the landbank position for sand and gravel and the need for inert waste disposal in the County.
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the free flow of traffic, with regard also to whether sufficient information has been provided to ensure compliance with the tests in regulation 122(2) of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010.
- The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of National Site Networks, with particular regard to hydrogeology and the displacement of informal recreational use.
What decided it
The proposal's compliance with the adopted and emerging Minerals and Waste Plan allocation, combined with the absence of severe highway impacts and no adverse effect on the integrity of the National Site Networks, meant the significant benefits of the scheme outweighed any identified harms.
The significant benefits of the scheme, including the demonstrable need for sand and gravel supply and beneficial use of inert waste, outweighed any adverse impacts likely to be associated with it, including highway, ecological, noise, air quality and heritage considerations, none of which were found to cause significant harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 20 HMWPPolicy 17 HMWPPolicy 25 HMWPPolicy 30 HMWPPolicy 27 HMWPPolicy 3 HMWPPolicy 7 HMWPPolicy 10 HMWPPolicy 11 HMWPPolicy 12 HMWPStrategic Policy 11 EBLPStrategic Policy S8 EBLPPolicy DM11 EBLPPolicy DM12 EBLPPolicy DM5 EBLP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 49Paragraph 57Paragraph 116Paragraph 226
- Judgments
- R(Wyatt) v Fareham Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 983; R (Morge) v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 2; [2011] 1 WLR 268; R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council and others [2024] UKSC 20
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hampshire County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice varied and upheld5 February 20263333869Shedfield Equestrian Centre, Botley Road, Shedfield, Southampton, Hampshire, SO32 2HN
- Allowed20 June 20223279319Land off A272, Three Maids Hill, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2QU
- Unknown3 March 20263373990The New Forest, Hampshire, SP5 2PU
- Dismissed28 November 20253370136Lockhams Recycling, Botley Road, Shedfield, Southampton, SO32 2HN
- Unknown25 November 20253372708Land at Stratfield Saye, Basingstoke and Deane, Hants
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®