Planning appeal decision
Former Hamble Airfield, Hamble Lane, Hamble Le Rice, Hampshire , SO31 4NE
the extraction of sand and gravel, with restoration to grazing land and recreation using imported inert restoration materials, the erection of associated plant and infrastructure and the creation of a new footpath and access onto Hamble Lane
- Authority
- Hampshire County Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- minerals-waste · Unknown
- Inspector
- Normington S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The need for the proposed development with particular regard to the landbank position for sand and gravel and the need for inert waste disposal in the County.
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the free flow of traffic, with regard also to whether sufficient information has been provided to ensure compliance with the tests in regulation 122(2) of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010.
- The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of National Site Networks, with particular regard to hydrogeology and the displacement of informal recreational use.
What decided it
The proposal's compliance with the adopted and emerging Minerals and Waste Plan allocation, combined with the absence of severe highway impacts and no adverse effect on the integrity of the National Site Networks, meant the significant benefits of the scheme outweighed any identified harms.
The significant benefits of the scheme, including the demonstrable need for sand and gravel supply and beneficial use of inert waste, outweighed any adverse impacts likely to be associated with it, including highway, ecological, noise, air quality and heritage considerations, none of which were found to cause significant harm.
Framework references: 11, 49, 57, 116, 226
Plan policies cited: Policy 20 HMWP, Policy 17 HMWP, Policy 25 HMWP, Policy 30 HMWP, Policy 27 HMWP, Policy 3 HMWP, Policy 7 HMWP, Policy 10 HMWP, Policy 11 HMWP, Policy 12 HMWP, Strategic Policy 11 EBLP, Strategic Policy S8 EBLP, Policy DM11 EBLP, Policy DM12 EBLP, Policy DM5 EBLP
Judgments cited: R(Wyatt) v Fareham Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 983; R (Morge) v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 2; [2011] 1 WLR 268; R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council and others [2024] UKSC 20
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®