Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 June 20253356171

Pavement Outside The Rotunda Centre, Clarence Street, Kingston upon Thames, London, KT1 1QP

installation of "Pulse Smart Hub" with integrated digital screens

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on public safety with respect to the operation of the highway
  • Whether the proposal demonstrates that energy consumption has been minimised

What decided it

The proposal would have an adverse effect on public safety with respect to the operation of the highway by creating a barrier to cyclist movement and increasing conflict between cyclists and pedestrians on a narrow pavement section adjacent to a cycle path.

Framework references: 164, 166

Plan policies cited: Kingston Core Strategy (2012) Policy DM8, Kingston Core Strategy (2012) Policy DM10, Kingston Core Strategy (2012) Policy CS14, London Plan (March 2021) Policy D3, London Plan (March 2021) Policy D8, London Plan (March 2021) Policy SI2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.