Planning appeal decision
369 - 371 Green Lanes, London, N13 4JH
Planning appeal 3356297 at 369 - 371 Green Lanes, London, N13 4JH (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 26 March 2025 by Inspector Jones H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal upon the health and vitality of Palmers Green District Centre including whether the proposal would result in an over-concentration of gambling uses in the area.
change of use of the ground floor commercial premises from Financial Services (Class E(c)(i)) to Adult Gaming Centre (Sui Generis) with 24/7 hours operation and minor alterations to the shopfront
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Jones H
- Postcode
- N13 4JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposal upon the health and vitality of Palmers Green District Centre including whether the proposal would result in an over-concentration of gambling uses in the area
- The effects of the proposal upon community cohesion with particular regard to its effects upon crime and anti-social behaviour in the area
- The effects of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area, including its effects upon the locally listed 315-397 Green Lanes (the Sykes Buildings)
- Whether appropriate provision would be made for cycle storage and refuse
What decided it
The proposal was found to accord with the development plan taken as a whole, with no demonstrable harm to town centre vitality, community cohesion, heritage or character and appearance.
the isolated conflict with Policy DMD40 on shopfront glazing was outweighed by compliance with the wide range of other relevant policies, such that the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole and no material considerations indicated a different outcome
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DMD33Policy DMD27Policy DMD37Policy DMD40Policy DMD41Policy DMD44Policy DMD45Policy DMD47Policy DMD48Policy GG1Policy GG2Policy GG3Policy SD6Policy SD8Policy HC6Policy HC1Policy D3Policy D8Policy E9Policy CP9Policy CP11Policy CP17Policy CP24Policy CP25Policy CP30Policy CP31Policy T5Policy T7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed6 August 2026600682628 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®