Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 March 20253356297

369 - 371 Green Lanes, London, N13 4JH

change of use of the ground floor commercial premises from Financial Services (Class E(c)(i)) to Adult Gaming Centre (Sui Generis) with 24/7 hours operation and minor alterations to the shopfront

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Jones H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal upon the health and vitality of Palmers Green District Centre including whether the proposal would result in an over-concentration of gambling uses in the area
  • The effects of the proposal upon community cohesion with particular regard to its effects upon crime and anti-social behaviour in the area
  • The effects of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area, including its effects upon the locally listed 315-397 Green Lanes (the Sykes Buildings)
  • Whether appropriate provision would be made for cycle storage and refuse

What decided it

The proposal was found to accord with the development plan taken as a whole, with no demonstrable harm to town centre vitality, community cohesion, heritage or character and appearance.

the isolated conflict with Policy DMD40 on shopfront glazing was outweighed by compliance with the wide range of other relevant policies, such that the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole and no material considerations indicated a different outcome

Plan policies cited: Policy DMD33, Policy DMD27, Policy DMD37, Policy DMD40, Policy DMD41, Policy DMD44, Policy DMD45, Policy DMD47, Policy DMD48, Policy GG1, Policy GG2, Policy GG3, Policy SD6, Policy SD8, Policy HC6, Policy HC1, Policy D3, Policy D8, Policy E9, Policy CP9, Policy CP11, Policy CP17, Policy CP24, Policy CP25, Policy CP30, Policy CP31, Policy T5, Policy T7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.