Planning appeal decision
Land South of Destiny Cottage, Friday Lane, Solihull, West Midlands, B92 0HZ
construction of 2no detached executive houses to include external access infrastructure and landscaping
- Authority
- Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- the effect of the development on biodiversity
- whether the proposal would provide adequate means of surface water drainage and not increase flood risk
- the effect of the development on archaeology
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to visibility
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and other material harms that are not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits, and the strong Green Belt policy reasons for refusal disengage the tilted balance despite the housing land supply shortfall.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant to moderate harms to character and appearance, biodiversity, flood risk, archaeology and location sustainability were not outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of two executive houses, and the strong Green Belt policy reasons for refusal disengaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
Framework references: 154, 142, 11
Plan policies cited: Policy P17, Policy P5, Policy P15, Policy P7, Policy P10, Policy P11, Policy P16, Policy P8
Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin) [2015] EWCA Civ 195
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®