Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 June 20253356348

Land South of Destiny Cottage, Friday Lane, Solihull, West Midlands, B92 0HZ

Planning appeal 3356348 at Land South of Destiny Cottage, Friday Lane, Solihull, West Midlands, B92 0HZ (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 June 2025 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

construction of 2no detached executive houses to include external access infrastructure and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K
Postcode
B92 0HZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the development on biodiversity
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate means of surface water drainage and not increase flood risk
  • the effect of the development on archaeology
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to visibility
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and other material harms that are not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits, and the strong Green Belt policy reasons for refusal disengage the tilted balance despite the housing land supply shortfall.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant to moderate harms to character and appearance, biodiversity, flood risk, archaeology and location sustainability were not outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of two executive houses, and the strong Green Belt policy reasons for refusal disengaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P17Policy P5Policy P15Policy P7Policy P10Policy P11Policy P16Policy P8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 142Paragraph 11
Judgments
Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin) [2015] EWCA Civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Solihull

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266013961
    The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
  2. Allowed23 October 20266009733
    Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
  3. Allowed12 August 20266010526
    The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
  4. Allowed17 July 20266005246
    Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266006096
    The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.