Planning appeal decision
Land at Southview Terrace, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9ES
Planning appeal 3356921 at Land at Southview Terrace, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9ES (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 27 August 2025 by Inspector Rawle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including on the significance of the nearby Henfield Conservation Area, a designated heritage asset, through development within its setting.
the construction of detached dwelling with attached car port
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rawle S
- Postcode
- BN5 9ES
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including on the significance of the nearby Henfield Conservation Area, a designated heritage asset, through development within its setting
- Whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed dwelling having regard to the development plan policies relating to development outside built-up area boundaries
- The effect of the proposed development on ecology and protected species and whether or not it would contribute to the enhancement of existing biodiversity
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and the significance of the Henfield Conservation Area through development within its setting, combined with the failure to demonstrate that protected species would not be adversely affected, outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision under a normal planning balance.
The harm to the conservation area's setting, the inappropriate location outside the built-up area boundary, and the unresolved ecology concerns (afforded great weight, moderate weight and significant weight respectively) clearly outweighed the moderate weight afforded to housing supply benefits, self-build provision and economic benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 25 HDPFPolicy 26 HDPFPolicy 32 HDPFPolicy 33 HDPFPolicy 34 HDPFPolicy 12 HNPPolicy 3 HDPFPolicy 4 HDPFPolicy 1 HNPPolicy 1 HDPFPolicy 31 HDPF
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 October 20266012640The Fords, Bonfire Hill, Southwater, RH13 9BU
- Dismissed23 September 20266006961Spring Acres, West End Lane, Henfield, BN5 9RE
- Dismissed18 September 20266009474Sussex Topiary,, Naldretts Lane,, Rudgwick, Horsham,, RH12 3BU
- Allowed10 September 20266009593Land East of Spring Gardens, Washington, RH20 3BP
- Dismissed14 July 202660082071 Hilltop Cottages, The Mount, Ifield, RH11 0LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®