Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20253356956

Land to the rear of 81 and 83 Dore Road, Sheffield, S17 3ND

erection of two three storey buildings to provide residential apartments, with associated basement, car parking, works of hard and soft landscaping and other works incidental to the application proposals

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal should make a commitment to affordable housing provision

What decided it

The proposal's failure to secure appropriate contributions towards affordable housing provision, when the appeal site is properly aggregated with earlier phases of development at the same location, conflicts with Policy CS40 and the Framework's requirement to provide affordable homes, and this conflict cannot be outweighed by housing supply benefits under paragraph 11(d)(ii).

The benefits of housing delivery and use of a suitable small site within an existing settlement were outweighed by the significant conflict with affordable housing policy requirements, particularly given that paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework specifically refers to providing affordable homes.

Framework references: 11, 64, 65, 66, 73

Plan policies cited: Policy CS40 of the Sheffield Development Framework: Core Strategy (2009), Guideline GAH1 of the Council's Community Infrastructure Levy and Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document (2015)

Judgments cited: New Dawn Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Tewksbury Borough Council; Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council [2012] UKSC 13; Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v the Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; Cherkley Campaign Ltd, R (on the application of) v Mole Valley DC & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 567; The Queen on the Application of the City of Westminster v First Secretary of State Brandlord Limited [2002]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.