Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent 86 Tollesbury Road, Tolleshunt D'Arcy, Essex, CM9 8UB
Planning appeal 3357187 at Land Adjacent 86 Tollesbury Road, Tolleshunt D'Arcy, Essex, CM9 8UB (Maldon District Council) was allowed on 5 June 2025 by Inspector Warder S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site, the Tolleshunt D'Arcy Conservation Area (CA) and the settings of the Grade II listed buildings (LBs) at D'Arcy House and D'Arcy Cottage.
the erection of 5 dwellings and associated access road, parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Warder S
- Postcode
- CM9 8UB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site, the Tolleshunt D'Arcy Conservation Area (CA) and the settings of the Grade II listed buildings (LBs) at D'Arcy House and D'Arcy Cottage
- whether sufficient information has been submitted to properly assess the effect of the proposal on European Protected Species (bats)
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 86 Tollesbury Road with particular regard to privacy
- the effect of the proposal on Essex Coast European designated sites
What decided it
The considerable shortfall in the Council's five-year housing land supply (2.7 years) engaged the tilted balance under Framework paragraph 11(d), and the public benefits of housing delivery and the community woodland outweighed the limited less-than-substantial harm to heritage assets.
The significant weight in favour of housing delivery and modest economic and social benefits from the community woodland outweighed the limited less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area and the setting of D'Arcy House, with the tilted balance applied due to the shortfall in five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy D1Policy D3Policy H4Policy N1Policy N2Policy H2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Shimizu case
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266011264Rosary, Grange Road, Tillingham, CM0 7UR
- Dismissed16 October 20266009926Agricultural Building At Wraywick Farm, The Marshes, Southminster, CM0 7JN
- Dismissed14 October 20266009639Land Adjacent Howells Farm Cottages, Maypole Road, Great Totham, CM9 4SY
- Allowed16 September 2026601290643 Main Road, St Lawrence, Chelmsford, CM0 7LY
- Allowed18 August 20266005664Land West of Spratts Farm, Queenborough Road, Southminster, CM0 7AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®