Planning appeal decision
Land west of Milbourne, Malmesbury
outline planning application (all matters reserved except access) for erection of up to 92 dwellings (including 40% affordable housing) together with associated access, parking, pedestrian and cycle routes, public open space, play space, landscaping, drainage and associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Wiltshire Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the scheme accords with the development plan in respect of its scale, nature and location
- whether the location of the site and means of connectivity to services and facilities would be adequate for future residents to help reduce reliance on private vehicles
- the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area combined with inadequate, unsafe connectivity to Malmesbury significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing supply benefits under the tilted balance.
the significant benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, public open space, biodiversity and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance and the significant harm from inadequate connectivity and vehicle dependency, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy 1 of the Core Strategy, Policy 2 of the Core Strategy, Policy 13 of the Core Strategy, Policy 3 of the MNP, Policy 60 of the Core Strategy, Policy 61 of the Core Strategy, Policy 51 of the Core Strategy, Policy 57 of the Core Strategy, Policy 13 of the MNP, CS Policy CP43
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®