Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted16 May 20253358097

Wickhamford Lane, Evesham, Worcs, WR11 7RW

The unauthorised material change of use of the land from agricultural to residential and the unauthorised operational development consisting of the erection of a dwelling and laying of hardstanding

Authority
Wychavon District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Merrett R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the landscape
  • whether the development is in a sustainable location
  • the personal circumstances of the appellant
  • the question of need for a planning obligation to secure a financial contribution to the provision of affordable housing

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance, under which the moderate harm from the unsustainable location did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the development.

the moderate adverse weight given to the unsustainable location and conflict with the development plan as a whole was outweighed by the limited economic benefit, moderate social benefit and positive weight given to the appellant's personal circumstances, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under the Framework's tilted balance

Framework references: 11, 65, 58

Plan policies cited: Policy SWDP 17, Policy SWDP 21, Policy SWDP 25, Policy SWDP 2, Policy SWDP 19, Policy SWDP 4, Policy SWDP 15

Judgments cited: Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No.2) [2000] 2 PLR 102

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.