Pear Tree Cottage Netherwood Lane, Chadwick End, Solihull, B93 0BD

Planning appeal 3358625 at Pear Tree Cottage Netherwood Lane, Chadwick End, Solihull, B93 0BD (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 June 2025 by Inspector S Edwards, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

demolition of existing side conservatory and the erection of a single storey side extension

Authority: Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: S Edwards
Postcode: B93 0BD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The cumulative effect of previous extensions combined with the proposed 53% increase in floorspace would constitute disproportionate additions to the original building, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt that is not justified by very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy P17
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Solihull

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

Dismissed23 October 20266013961
The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
Allowed23 October 20266009733
Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
Allowed12 August 20266010526
The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
Allowed17 July 20266005246
Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
Dismissed28 May 20266006096
The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.