Planning appeal decision
Cookshill Hall, Roughcote Lane, Caverswall, Staffordshire, ST11 9EG
Planning appeal 3358776 at Cookshill Hall, Roughcote Lane, Caverswall, Staffordshire, ST11 9EG (Staffordshire Moorlands District Council) was dismissed on 28 May 2025 by Inspector Billings C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies, including the effects on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
erection of self-build dwelling including resource efficient design
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Billings C
- Postcode
- ST11 9EG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies, including the effects on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the setting of a non-designated heritage asset
- biodiversity
- if inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, combined with harm to character and appearance and biodiversity, is not clearly outweighed by the benefits of one self-build dwelling in an area with unmet housing need, and paragraph 11d)i of the Framework provides a strong reason for refusal.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with moderate harm to heritage significance and likely biodiversity harm, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefit of contributing to housing supply and the limited social and economic benefits of construction and occupation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H1Policy SS10Policy SS9Policy DC1Policy DC2Policy DC3Policy NE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Staffordshire Moorlands
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 2026601419875, Rudyard Road, Biddulph Moor, ST8 7JW
- Allowed7 September 20266011103Land Between Rudyard Road and Hot Lane, Rudyard Road, Biddulph Moor, ST8 7JL
- Dismissed18 August 20266008539Land Adjacent Fulwood, School Road, Bagnall, ST9 9JP
- Dismissed12 August 20266010932Willow House, Leek Road, Stoke-On-Trent, ST9 9QF
- Allowed15 July 20266007233Thornby Lodge, Consall Forge, Wetley Rock, ST9 0AJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®