Planning appeal decision
Land Between 15 and 17, Beech Way, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP12 4BW
Planning appeal 3358818 at Land Between 15 and 17, Beech Way, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP12 4BW (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 26 August 2025 by Inspector Cragg D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the distribution of housing.
construction of 5 two storey dwellings. Formation of vehicular access, associated landscaping
- Authority
- East Suffolk
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cragg D
- Postcode
- IP12 4BW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the distribution of housing
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the development on the setting of Woodbridge Conservation Area and nearby grade II listed Kingston Hall and Kingston Barn
- the effect of the development on protected and priority species
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of properties on Birch Close with regard to outlook
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole, particularly in relation to location outside the settlement boundary, harm to landscape character and the rural setting of listed buildings, and inadequate protection for protected species, with no material considerations indicating a decision should be taken other than in accordance with the development plan.
The modest public benefits of 5 dwellings in a context where the Council has a 5-year housing land supply would not outweigh the great weight to be given to the conservation of heritage assets and the harm to landscape character.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SCLP3.2Policy SCLP3.3Policy SCLP5.3Policy SCLP5.4Policy SCLP12.31Policy SCLP10.4Policy SCLP11.1Policy SCLP11.2Policy SCLP11.3Policy SCLP11.4Policy SCLP11.5Policy SCLP10.1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 73Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Suffolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 2026600299317 Market Place, Southwold, IP18 6EB
- Dismissed29 October 2026600299017 Market Place, Southwold, IP18 6EB
- Dismissed27 October 20266009600Part Land Rear Of Grove Cottage, The Street, Little Bealings, IP13 6LT
- Dismissed27 October 2026600385827 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, IP12 1EG
- Dismissed27 October 2026600385527 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, IP12 1EG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®