Planning appeal decision
Covers Quarry, Westerham , Kent, TN16 2ER
Planning appeal 3358947 at Covers Quarry, Westerham , Kent, TN16 2ER (Kent County Council) was allowed on 30 July 2025 by Inspector Normington S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The relevance of the extant planning permission and alternatives.
the stabilisation and restoration of Covers Farm Quarry using imported engineering materials to restore the site to grassland, including landscape planting and an ecological receptor area together with a temporary road and ancillary buildings
- Authority
- Kent County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- minerals-waste · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Normington S
- Postcode
- TN16 2ER
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The relevance of the extant planning permission and alternatives.
- The need for the proposed development to resolve stability issues with particular regard to hydrological and geotechnical considerations.
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area.
- The need for inert waste management in the County and whether the amount of inert waste proposed to be imported is justified and available to achieve the restoration objectives of the appeal site.
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and relevant development plan policies.
- Whether the effects of the proposed development on highway safety and the efficient operation of the highway network, the effect of noise on sensitive receptors and the effect on heritage assets or other matters weigh in the planning balance.
- The planning balance with particular regard to whether the proposal is inappropriate development within the Green Belt and whether it would constitute sustainable development.
What decided it
The compelling and undisputed evidence of land instability and inadequate drainage at the former quarry, which could only be resolved by the proposed importation of engineering fill to achieve a stable, restored landform.
The substantial benefits of resolving land stability and drainage problems, restoring the landscape within the National Landscape, eliminating public safety risks from the North Lake, and providing continued inert waste disposal capacity outweighed the negligible less-than-substantial heritage harm to Court Lodge and other minor adverse effects, tipping the balance in favour of allowing the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSW 1Policy CSW 2Policy CSW 11Policy DM 2Policy DM 4Policy DM 5Policy DM 10Policy DM 11Policy DM 13Policy DM 18Policy DM 19Policy DM 20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 102Paragraph 116Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 215Paragraph 224
- Judgments
- R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] UKSC 3; Europa Oil and Gas Ltd. v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWHC 2643 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Kent County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Unknown12 March 20263376031Appeal 3376031
- Unknown2 March 20263347586Appeal 3347586
- Split Decision20 January 20263333923Land at Chilmington Green, Ashford Road, Great Chart, Ashford, Kent, TN23 3DT
- Unknown10 December 20253362633Appeal 3362633
- Unknown7 November 20253359373Appeal 3359373
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®