Planning appeal decision
Private Car Parking Area at Southern End of Stafferton Way, Maidenhead, SL6 1AY
Planning appeal 3359052 at Private Car Parking Area at Southern End of Stafferton Way, Maidenhead, SL6 1AY (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 3 June 2025 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a satisfactory location for the scheme having regard to flood risk.
the construction of 25 apartments over 5 & 6 storeys together with outside amenity, parking, bin & cycle stores
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Philpott M
- Postcode
- SL6 1AY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a satisfactory location for the scheme having regard to flood risk
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would make satisfactory provision for affordable housing
- whether the proposal would incorporate satisfactory measures to adapt to and mitigate climate change
- the effect of the proposal on ecology, including whether it would secure biodiversity net gain
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to whether it would have a satisfactory vehicular access
- whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation, with particular regard to light receipt, outlook and the quantity of internal and external space
What decided it
The proposal fails to demonstrate that the site is not at higher flood risk than reasonably available alternatives, thereby breaching the sequential test which is a strong reason for refusal under the Framework.
The substantial benefits of housing delivery and use of previously developed land in an accessible location were outweighed by the strong policy reason for refusal on flood risk grounds and, even if that were overcome, by the substantial harm to character and appearance, failure to incorporate satisfactory climate change measures, and ecological implications.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NR1Policy NR2Policy NR3Policy QP3Policy QP3aPolicy HO3Policy EP1Policy SP2Policy SP1Policy QP1aPolicy IF2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 73Paragraph 116Paragraph 124Paragraph 125Paragraph 172Paragraph 192
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Allowed26 October 20266014376Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed9 October 2026600900559 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®