Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 June 20253359392

24 Southspring, Avery Hill, London, DA15 8EA

the erection of self-contained dwelling house having 2-bedroom and a study on land adjacent to extended existing dwelling house

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lo S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at No.3 Radfield Road
  • the effect of the proposed car parking arrangement, having regard to transport accessibility and connectivity

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through overlooking and overbearing impact, combined with non-compliance with car parking standards, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefit of a single dwelling in the context of the tilted balance.

The very significant undersupply of housing land (2.46 years) engaged the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), but the adverse impacts of inadequate neighbour amenity and excessive car parking provision significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefit of one additional dwelling when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DH(b) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy T6.1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy IM(c) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), Policy T2 of the London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.