Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20253359396

64 Grosvenor Road, London, E11 2ES

Planning appeal 3359396 at 64 Grosvenor Road, London, E11 2ES (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 24 April 2025 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the semi-detached pair of which it forms part and that of the local area, with reference to the Wanstead Grove Conservation Area.

the removal of chimney stack on rear elevation. Loft conversion with a rear dormer and rooflight. Hip to gable roof alterations. Alterations to first floor rear elevation. Three front roof lights, one rear rooflight and one side window in the proposed gable

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
E11 2ES

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the semi-detached pair of which it forms part and that of the local area, with reference to the Wanstead Grove Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed hip to gable alteration would result in substantial harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and conservation area by creating visual imbalance and appearing incongruous within the cohesive group of hipped roof semi-detached properties, contrary to local plan policies and the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP26LP30LP33HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

414 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  3. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  4. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  5. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.