Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 May 20253359947

Telecommunications Site off Jordan Thorpe Parkway, Boundary Club Rfc, Sheffield, S8 8BU

Planning appeal 3359947 at Telecommunications Site off Jordan Thorpe Parkway, Boundary Club Rfc, Sheffield, S8 8BU (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 21 May 2025 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

removal and replacement of mast, antennas and ancillary development. Removal and replacement of: 14.5m mast incorporating 12.5m monopole, headframe, 3No. antennas, 1No. 300mm dish, 3No. cabinets (2No. 1300x700x1450mm; 1No. 600x600x1415mm) and all ancillary development with:17.5m high mast and headframe (galvanised steel, Grey), 12No. antennas (RAL7035 Grey), 2No. 300mm dishes (RAL7035 Grey), 2No. cabinets (1No. 800x660x1770mm; 1No. 705x931x2068mm), (RAL7035 Grey) and all ancillary development

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
S8 8BU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The appellant did not submit evidence demonstrating that no more suitable alternative sites existed which would achieve the same coverage, therefore the harm to character and appearance was not outweighed by operational need.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 122

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009090
    Meadow Farm, Whiteley Wood Road, Sheffield, S11 7TJ
  2. Dismissed12 February 20263372994
    Claremont Hospital, 401 Sandygate Road, Sheffield, S10 5UB
  3. Allowed29 January 20263371401
    Land Opposite Alnwick Road, Hollinsend Road, Sheffield, S12 2EB
  4. Allowed7 January 20263374522
    Land Opposite Junction With Low Road, Stannington Road, Sheffield, S6 5FH
  5. Allowed2 December 20253373519
    Land Adjacent to Verdon Recreation Centre, 218 Verdon Street, Sheffield, S3 9QN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.