Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20253360330

Greenways, Vicarage Lane, Olveston, BRISTOL, BS35 4BT

construction of a replacement dwelling following the demolition of the existing house and outbuildings

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harrington S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, including the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to character and appearance, is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.

the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduction of openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by moderate benefits from a modern dwelling and construction-period economic gains, so the appeal was dismissed

Framework references: 154, 143, 153, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CS1 of the South Gloucestershire Local Plan: Core Strategy (2013), Policy CS5 of the South Gloucestershire Local Plan: Core Strategy (2013), Policy PSP1 of the South Gloucestershire Policies Sites and Places Plan (2017)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.