Planning appeal decision
Walnut Tree Cottage Brick End, Broxted, Dunmow, CM6 2BJ
Planning appeal 3360352 at Walnut Tree Cottage Brick End, Broxted, Dunmow, CM6 2BJ (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 21 January 2026 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would provide a suitable location for housing having regard to relevant development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the countryside.
‘erection of a two bedroom bungalow, access, landscaping and associated development’
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bowyer J
- Postcode
- CM6 2BJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would provide a suitable location for housing having regard to relevant development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the countryside
- The effect of the proposal on heritage assets
- Whether or not the proposal would make adequate provision for biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that the development would not cause harm to heritage assets and the character and appearance of the countryside, combined with inadequate provision for biodiversity net gain in breach of statutory requirements, outweighed the public benefits of housing delivery in a location with a shortfall in housing supply.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of Oakmeads, although at a low level and attracting considerable weight, was not outweighed by the cumulative public benefits comprising housing supply contribution (significant weight), economic benefits (moderate weight), sustainable design measures (limited weight), and potential care support (limited weight due to lack of substantive evidence and mechanism to ensure delivery), particularly given the permanent nature of the development and the absence of adequate biodiversity net gain provision.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S7Policy S8Policy ENV2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed26 October 202660102676 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009731Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
- Allowed6 October 20266006335Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
- Dismissed1 October 20266010951Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®