Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20253360462

LAND AT MILL ROAD, MILL ROAD, RADSTOCK, BA3 3PX

terrace of 3 dwellings

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edwards J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable in principle for 3 dwellings having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development
  • The matter of flood risk
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the Radstock Conservation Area
  • The spatial strategy as set out in the development plan

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate compliance with the sequential test for flood risk, which provides a strong reason for refusal that engages the exception in paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework and displaces the presumption in favour of granting permission.

The housing benefits and potential biodiversity gains were afforded significant weight, particularly in light of the shortage of housing land supply, but did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, and the strong reasons for refusal on flood risk justified dismissal despite the housing land supply shortfall.

Framework references: 11, 174, 181, 212

Plan policies cited: CP5, DW1, SV1, RE4, HE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.