Planning appeal decision
North West Turf, Mickering Lane, Aughton, West Lancashire, L39 6SR
Planning appeal 3360564 at North West Turf, Mickering Lane, Aughton, West Lancashire, L39 6SR (West Lancashire District Council) was dismissed on 23 October 2025 by Inspector Lancaster K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
outline planning permission for the erection of an agricultural workers dwelling (all matters reserved)
- Authority
- West Lancashire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
- Postcode
- L39 6SR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having particular regard to the development plan
- The effect of the proposed development on protected species
- If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, including whether there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker at the site, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate an essential need for a rural worker to live permanently at or near the site, meaning the substantial Green Belt harm and other harm were not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, together with additional harm to openness and to protected species, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (found to be of only modest weight), so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GN1Policy RS1Policy GN5Policy EN2Policy GN3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 84Paragraph 88
- Judgments
- Embleton Parish Council v Northumberland County Council [2013] EWHC 3631; Rafael Suarez v SSCLG v Forest of Dean District Council [2017] EWHC (Admin) 1552
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Lancashire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 202660137566 Moss Lane, Bickerstaffe, L39 0EX
- Allowed5 October 20266010014Land at Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall, West Lancs, L39 8SH
- Allowed23 September 20266007484Boltons Farm, Blackgate Lane, Tarleton, PR4 6UX
- Dismissed22 September 20266007428Land Adjacent to Model Farm, Plex Lane, Halsall, Ormskirk, L39 7JY
- Dismissed15 September 202660121883 Broad Lane, Downholland, Ormskirk, L39 7HS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®