Planning appeal decision
12 Hythe End Road, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5AR
Planning appeal 3360578 at 12 Hythe End Road, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5AR (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was allowed on 4 November 2025 by Inspector Sibley G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
replacement house and garage, following demolition of existing house, garages and sheds
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sibley G
- Postcode
- TW19 5AR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 10 and 14 Hythe End Road with regard to outlook, light and privacy
- whether suitable measures would be included to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change
- whether the proposal would make appropriate provision for biodiversity net gain
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight attributed to the net zero carbon emissions benefit, combined with the self-build housing provision and fallback position, clearly outweighed the identified harm to the Green Belt and openness, establishing the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy QP1Policy QP3Policy QP4Policy SP2Policy EP1Policy NR2Policy HOU1Policy HOU2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed23 September 202660083374 Whurley Way, Maidenhead, SL6 7SS
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®