Planning appeal decision
Land South of Kimbers Lane, Maidenhead, SL6 2QP
Planning appeal 3360693 at Land South of Kimbers Lane, Maidenhead, SL6 2QP (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 9 September 2025 by Inspector Raygen Z, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to parking and Kimbers Lane.
Outline planning permission for access and layout for 32 dwellings
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Raygen Z
- Postcode
- SL6 2QP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to parking and Kimbers Lane
- The effect of the development on trees
- Whether the proposal provides an acceptable provision of affordable housing and other infrastructure
- The effect of the development on ecology
- Whether the proposal makes effective connections to adjacent parcels of land
- Whether the proposal will provide acceptable living conditions for prospective occupiers, including those on the adjacent site, with particular regard to outdoor space and privacy
- Whether the proposal delivers acceptable levels of play space
What decided it
The combination of harm to character and appearance from the siting of large apartment blocks close to Kimbers Lane, unacceptable impacts on trees, and failure to secure required infrastructure contributions meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
The significant benefits of housing delivery (4.47-year supply shortfall), affordable housing provision, wheelchair accessibility, CIL contributions (£1,472,569.35), and SME housebuilder status were outweighed by considerable environmental harms to character and appearance, trees, and protected species, together with the failure to secure infrastructure contributions required by policy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP1bPolicy QP3Policy HO3Policy NR2Policy NR3Policy INF4AL13 Pro Forma
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Allowed26 October 20266014376Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed9 October 2026600900559 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®