Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld9 February 20263360887

131-133 South Road, Waterloo, Liverpool, L22 0LT

Planning appeal 3360887 at 131-133 South Road, Waterloo, Liverpool, L22 0LT (Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 February 2026 by Inspector Hartley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the flats in respect of the absence of outside amenity space.

a retrospective planning application to regularise the creation of 4no. separate self-contained 1-bedroom flats at 1st and 2nd floor level

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hartley D
Postcode
L22 0LT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the flats in respect of the absence of outside amenity space

What decided it

The substantial positive contribution to housing supply in an area with only 3.5 years of deliverable housing land, combined with the sustainable location and economic benefits to the district centre, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate harm from the absence of private outside amenity space.

The living conditions harm caused by the absence of private outside amenity space and conflict with policy HC4 was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery, sustainable location, efficient use of land, and economic benefits to the district centre when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HC4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 232

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

75 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sefton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed29 October 20266012707
    144 Park Lane, Netherton, L30 1RW
  2. Dismissed23 September 20266008723
    Land to the Rear of Abbey Gardens, Southport Road, Lydiate, L31 4EQ
  3. Dismissed9 September 20266009026
    64 Thornton Road, Bootle, L20 5AR
  4. Dismissed7 September 20266010758
    14 Blundell Drive, Birkdale, PR8 4RG
  5. Dismissed7 September 20266008359
    9 Green Lane, Formby, L37 7DJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.