Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20253361014

Orchard Place Heniker Lane, Sutton Valence, Kent, ME17 3EE

Planning appeal 3361014 at Orchard Place Heniker Lane, Sutton Valence, Kent, ME17 3EE (Maidstone Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 July 2025 by Inspector Kemmann-Lane T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the relationship of the proposal on the existing buildings and the character of the countryside.

demolish three existing commercial buildings and erection of a rear extension and side canopy to one existing commercial building

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Kemmann-Lane T
Postcode
ME17 3EE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the relationship of the proposal on the existing buildings and the character of the countryside
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjacent dwelling

What decided it

The proposed extension would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjacent dwelling Braemar Oak through material deterioration of outlook from the house and garden.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LPRSP9LPRSP11LPRSP15LPRQD4LPRCD6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 200

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010536
    21 Tasker Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, ME15 8NZ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266015190
    Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
  3. Allowed27 October 20266011721
    Loxley House, Gravelly Bottom Road, Kingswood, Maidstone, ME17 3NT
  4. Allowed27 October 20266011076
    Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
  5. Allowed26 October 20266010539
    Land Rear Of 58 Church Street, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.