Planning appeal decision
Dismissed8 May 20253361021
22 Elaine Grove, LONDON, NW5 4QG
a roof extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cleary D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the building and surrounding area
- The living conditions of neighbouring properties with particular regard to loss of privacy
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of non-designated heritage assets, to which significant weight was given, could not be outweighed by the very limited public benefits of the scheme.
Framework references: 216
Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy A1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®