Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20253361021

22 Elaine Grove, LONDON, NW5 4QG

a roof extension

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cleary D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the building and surrounding area
  • The living conditions of neighbouring properties with particular regard to loss of privacy

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of non-designated heritage assets, to which significant weight was given, could not be outweighed by the very limited public benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 216

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy A1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.